As part
of my devotions lately, I have been reading a chapter per day from the book, Crazy Love by Francis Chan. It seems
Chan's book is the Purpose-Driven Life
of this decade, so I thought I better check it out. A few days ago, I read
Chan's comments on page 46: " In about fifty years (give or take a couple
of decades), no one will remember you. Everyone you know will be dead.
Certainly no one will care about what job you had, what car you drove, what
school you attended, or what clothes you wore." I have spent the last
couple of days mulling that over.
At first
glance, this is a horribly-depressing statement, only because our first
reactions, as humans, to anything in life are always selfish. We get a little
panicky because we start thinking about the fact that it will seem as though we
never existed. Then, after those initial thoughts dissipate, it's a charge to
make sure that every second we are here counts - not in a hedonistic way but
satisfying our time and place purpose.
Then, I
started thinking about all the physical items that are left behind to remind us
that A PERSON EXISTED. There are memories, but those aren't tangible, and they
are valid only as long as the rememberer exists. Even then, the memories are somewhat flawed;
if you are 100% honest, you will agree that a memory gets "juicier"
and more detailed the more often it is told. What, then, is a true memory?
There are photographs, but even those aren't accurate because they are only
snapshots of a particular moment in time; plus, they give no additional
information regarding the person's thoughts, hopes, moods, etc. Seriously,
think about how many times you have smiled at the camera when you felt more
like punching someone or bawling your eyes out. A person's existence can be
legitimized through legal documents, but they certainly do not give a true
indication of what s/he was like. Likewise, his/her "stuff" may give
an indication of what s/he valued in life, but all that "stuff"
eventually wears out, becomes obsolete, and let's face it, is worth nothing.
In my
opinion, journals and diaries are the most valuable, tangible objects to keep
the memory of a person who is no longer here alive.
If that's
the case, then our generation should be well-documented. Facebook, Twitter, and MySpace (supposedly
making a comeback) have given those who want to participate the opportunity to
document the minutia of their lives. Blogging has become a voyeuristic activity
for both writers and readers. The Internet is glutted with the words and
sentences of people who want to be both heard and remembered. It seems they are
getting their wish; the Library of Congress is now archiving text messages for
posterity. At first glance, that seems like a silly concept (and it is), but in
the long run, it will be an interesting anthropological study of what this
generation was like - what we talked about, what we were concerned about, what
was important to us.
Call me a
pessimist, but the electronic element in all of this just feels a little Brave New World to me - cold and
sterile; devoid of artistic appeal and pathos. While it restores the personal
touch that photographs and memories lack, it still feels lacking.
A couple
of months ago, I acquired a potpourri of boxes containing some of my grandma's
stuff. She died on February 7, so opening up the boxes spurred a walk down
memory lane. A good portion of the items in the boxes were sewing items, and as
I dug around, sifting through I came across a small tablet. It was recipe card
size with perforations at the top - the idea was that you could write a recipe
and rip it out from the tablet to either share or put into a recipe box. As I
opened it up and started flipping through, I saw it was a daily journal from
1982. Each day for a few months, Grandma had written a few lines about the day.
Even though she didn't say anything extraordinary or profound, I heard what was
on her mind, and it was written in her handwriting.
It was
the best treasure in the box.
To date,
I have something like ten journals stuffed away in my drawer. I jokingly (but
not so jokingly) have instructed my BFF that if I die before her, she has to
grab all of them and burn them. In those hand-written journals are my thoughts,
frustrations, joys, judgments, and praises. While the journals show what was on
my heart at any given moment, they have not always been so flattering -
concerning me and everyone else. They are, however, an accurate and sometimes,
heart-wrenching, chronology of my personal and spiritual journey.
Even as I
type this, I wonder if fifty years from now pens and paper will still be
accessible? Will anyone know how to write in cursive? Will anyone actually do
it? Will anyone be able to read it? Even
now, my students complain that they can't read the comments I put on their
papers because they are hand-written and not printed. It's just weird to think
about since paper and penmanship have been such a big part of our lives for
something like 500 years.
And to
me, something handwritten, especially with regard to a journal or diary, is far
more valuable. It is the rich combination of a person's intimate thoughts and
handwriting - a true window to his/her heart. Of all the historical artifacts
(and I like history), the letters are the most valuable to me at a museum. It
adds a personal perspective to a historical event, much like Anne Frank does in
her diary. Likewise, the handwritten items are a form of art. Both the United States Constitution and Declaration of Independence are lovely
to look at simply because of the ornate handwriting.
Even so,
I think I am in the minority in believing that. Am I anti-technology? Not at
all, but I will readily admit that I am cautiously pessimistic about throwing
out the old to replace the new. Every time that happens, something is lost -
sometimes, this is good; oftentimes, it is not.
As to
Francis Chan's comments, quite honestly, I have no qualms about being forgotten
fifty years from now. I will do what I can do, and I will try to fulfill my
destiny in the best way I can. I am completely at peace with that idea. As to
my journals, I am still on the fence with regard to that issue. Personally, I
think here is something purely magical about pen, ink, and handwriting;
however, I am not so convinced that future generations will agree. If they read
them, however, they will have a definite portrait of who I was, and they will learn that my thoughts, dreams, and struggles weren't
all that much different than theirs.
No comments:
Post a Comment